Welcome Guest Login or Signup
CHAT | INSTANT MESSENGER | BOOKMARK US | LANGUAGE:
 


FORUM
New Posts | My Topics | Profile Forum | User Settings | Subscriptions
Post Reply
Safety - Damn it takes the fun out of everything!
Total Views: 271 - Total Replies: 22
Aug 07 2008, 7:09 am - By MistressLycia


So, I made a post a while back about sissy safety. I had a sub who wanted to hook up with random men on craigslist to provide oral sex to them and swallow their cum. I posted My concern on various sites, and got some helpful responses. What it came down to is that, if I am going to be a good Mistress and keep My subbie safe, then I am supposed to make sure he gets medical records from potential penises, and also be sure they use a condom during oral. Of course I don't want to be responsible (even in part) for anyone's illness, but this made it way more difficult then it already was for this sub to get a penis to suck.

And aside from sissification and forced bi, I also love tease and denial. Me and one of My current subs were having a great time keeping him denied for very prolonged periods of time. I was even considering not allowing him cummies ever again. But we've been doing research on prostate health, and apparently it isn't "good" to let all the cummies build up inside without release, because it could cause prostate issues. I know that when he gets "too full," he experiences lolstreamz (rivulets of semen that come out of the penis without any experience of pleasure), and he also has a lot of teardrops (precum), but I am not sure this is enough to keep his prostate healthy. Meanwhile, prostate milking (rectal massage used to induce ejaculation without actual orgasm) is one of his limits. 

So now I feel like I have to let him make cummies (at least occassionally) so that there is less of a chance of prostate problems. And this sucks, because I don't *want* him to make cummies. I suppose I can allow ruined orgasms on occassion (in which he'd have to stop touching as soon as orgasm hits, allowing the semen to dribble out without the feeling of orgasm), but I'd rather not even allow that.

It just sucks that we have to think about disease and illness when it comes to these erotic things. I mean, even with just vanilla sex. Erotic experience would flow so much more easily if we didn't have to say, "Oh wait, we need a condom" or "Nono, don't do that with your fingers, it could cause infection!"

Ah well, I suppose it is part of life. If I am going to keep Myself and My subbies safe, then stuff is going to be a little annoying. 

Goddess Lycia is the Ultimate Hypnodomme
Advertise
Aug 07 2008, 7:54 am - Replied by: MistressMadame


he can still milk without prostate massaging, can't he?  What I mean by this is jerking him off and just as he cums, then he or you releases the cock so the stimulation halts, making it so that he cums without orgasm.


Also,I have read various reports online about how NOT cumming wont hurt males... I think if it there IS any real damage that can be done from prolonged denial, it will be from YEARS of not cumming, not some months...  Furthermore, many people worldwide choose this lifestyle of complete abstinence and I don't know if the risks are THAT huge (other than to their ego).


I would tell him to consult a doctor about this issue (that way there is some liability involvede and grounds for a suit where you are the sole beneficiary in case the dr is wrong)... possibly have him write your sub a dr's note for a cumming prescription (lol@the humiliation of having to explain why) and then follow the recommended regime-- however, cumming has nothing to do with orgasming, and if he does this on the phone with you, you will be able to tell if he is receiving pleasure and then fine his ass for being deceitful.

 

but yes, I agree, safety concerns are always a bit of a debbie downer.

Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another (literally)... However, deprived is the man who lives only to serve himself.
Aug 08 2008, 12:48 am - Replied by: bentover2007


Those non-orgasmic ejaculations suck!  You ladies know way too much about how our little things work.
Aug 08 2008, 8:59 am - Replied by: MistressLycia



bentover2007 wrote:

Those non-orgasmic ejaculations suck!  You ladies know way too much about how our little things work.

:-D

Goddess Lycia is the Ultimate Hypnodomme
Aug 08 2008, 9:38 am - Replied by: MistressMadame



bentover2007 wrote:

Those non-orgasmic ejaculations suck!  You ladies know way too much about how our little things work.

 

yes, we do... the better to control you with, My dear.

Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another (literally)... However, deprived is the man who lives only to serve himself.
Aug 10 2008, 8:59 am - Replied by: boy4beatin







Cumming once in a while intensifies the torment for me,
which in a previous relationship is exactly what my mistress wanted. If i had my way i’d cum every day. So a week in
denial is torment. i find that say after 2 weeks of denial the urge to cum
lessens. i’m not sure why. Maybe my mind becomes conditioned to not
cumming.  So for me if i’m aloud to
shoot/drain every 2-3 weeks i’d have thought that as safe, plus it keeps me
needing to cum and importantly keeps me submissive to my mistress.



 



Mistress Lycia. You prefer your sub to not cum at all.
i wonder if this is true of other Mistresses. Do you prefer to see a sub
completely denied of ever getting the chance to cum? Do you want to see him
explode once in while after a lengthy period of denial? Or do you like to administer
the slow drain of milking
?

Girls R 4 Licking, Boys R 4 beating
Aug 10 2008, 2:56 pm - Replied by: MistressLycia


It depends on the sub and our dynamic, as well as what I feel is best for him~
Goddess Lycia is the Ultimate Hypnodomme
Aug 11 2008, 7:35 am - Replied by: MistressMadame



boy4beatin wrote:

 So for me if i’m aloud to
shoot/drain every 2-3 weeks i’d have thought that as safe, plus it keeps me
needing to cum and importantly keeps me submissive to my mistress
.

 

If you need to cum in order to be subbmissive then I question your submission.

Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another (literally)... However, deprived is the man who lives only to serve himself.
Aug 11 2008, 7:36 am - Replied by: MistressMadame



boy4beatin wrote:


Mistress Lycia. You prefer your sub to not cum at all.
i wonder if this is true of other Mistresses. Do you prefer to see a sub
completely denied of ever getting the chance to cum? Do you want to see him
explode once in while after a lengthy period of denial? Or do you like to administer
the slow drain of milking
?

 

 

 

Depends.  I have been known to prolong a draining or two.  Personally, I am more focused on My pleasure than anyone elses.

Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another (literally)... However, deprived is the man who lives only to serve himself.
Aug 11 2008, 2:22 pm - Replied by: boy4beatin



MistressMadame wrote:


 

If you need to cum in order to be subbmissive then I question your submission.

 


 

Why Mistress Madame? If she was happy doing it this way then why question
my submission? She wanted to take maximum pleasure in my denial. If she
had a problem with me cumming every so often i'm certain i'd have been
told. This is what worked for us.

 

Girls R 4 Licking, Boys R 4 beating
Aug 11 2008, 3:09 pm - Replied by: MistressMadame



boy4beatin wrote:


MistressMadame wrote:


 

If you need to cum in order to be subbmissive then I question your submission.

 

Wanting your sub to have pleasure is not what I am talking about... I am talking aout your submission being contingent on your being able to cum... that doesn't seem right to Me.

 

Why Mistress Madame? If she was happy doing it this way then why question
my submission? She wanted to take maximum pleasure in my denial. If she
had a problem with me cumming every so often i'm certain i'd have been
told. This is what worked for us.

 

Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another (literally)... However, deprived is the man who lives only to serve himself.
Post Reply
Advertise

*** myDommeSpace ***